209 похожих чатов

@VOvadenko A question I have regarding treasury... Option 1x... They

calculate the APY every 60 seconds.... Could it be a situation in which the APY is negative? ... Not liquidation, but negative interest rate? Anyone knows?

6 ответов

13 просмотров
SanchoPumpZa-Panick Автор вопроса

But technically could that happen?... Can they be in a situation in which the trading done with the risky options go sour and the merchants fees cannot cover the rest?

when a leveraged position gets liquidated, those coins go to the treasury. So there would never be a negative in the treasury

SanchoPumpZa Panick
But technically could that happen?... Can they be ...

Staking 3.0 brings around $15M (as last reported) Djed will bring 10s of millions per month in a fully operational mainstream Cardano. Enterprise merchants will be loaded in the upcoming months. All of this will be used to buy COTI and distribute them to stakers. That's why I don't see us having a negative interest rate in realistic scenarios.

The Black Smit⚒⚔
when a leveraged position gets liquidated, those c...

If I understood correctly, theoretically, is there a possibility that when all leverage stakers "win" and the rewards outpace the revenue stream? I think since it is algorithmic, the math will not allow such occurrence. Just my initial thoughts 🙂

Vader
If I understood correctly, theoretically, is there...

well there is only a specific amount of coins in the treasury (revenue stream). The APY will be recalibrated every 60 seconds accordingly to what that current revenue stream is. (likely an avarage of revenue stream over X hours). so if the revenue stream goes down, so will the APY

SanchoPumpZa-Panick Автор вопроса
Vader
If I understood correctly, theoretically, is there...

This is what I also think... A 0% could be the case as the APY is not fixed.. Hopefully they trading algorithms will not allow for a loss and in a case of all stakers winning a part of the wins will be withhold and send to the 1x

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@LGCYMan @JustinKKW Q/A List 1. this part confuses me on #8: "From there, a bridge between erc20 LGXY and erc20 LGXY will be out once that swap is closed." does this mean ...
Sig | LGCY | BattleVerse L1 | BitWin
1
Did @Beeker really get banned? That's ridiculous. He's one of the few left here with half a brain and you might not always like his narrative @dgb_ycagel , but he often keeps ...
Leroy Gerrits
1
A couple thoughts from a random internet stranger: 1. If you want this project to gain traction you cannot keep being negative. If I just came here after finding out about Kd...
Eric Wild
46
We heading to 1.1$ 🤔?
CryptoBo$$
35
Agreed. And on a lighter note, I just love the idea of earning $FunToken while having fun. It’s like getting paid to do what we love. Who wouldn’t want that? 😄
SpaceGemz
13
I can answer questions or just drop the q/a?
Justin | LGCY |
9
But is may still valid as a goal ?
oneBlock!³
10
how/why would someone end up holding FBCH, that's the nut to crack would some bch holders be interested in donating BCH as incentive for others to lock up BCH if I offered 1...
bitcoincashautist
2
Ideally, when we launch a game from a particular studio, that studio should have the right to access the uniqs from their game on our wallet. For example, if you die in a Ubis...
Lisandru
16
Im quite curious how Stuart Popejoy, Will, Mike and so on. Relate to the institutional entities they wish to assist in onboarding onto web3. It feels like a pivotal conversa...
Aleksander @1Answers
3
Карта сайта