I request all users and validators to vote “NO” for kava proposal 73 (loan wars competition) due to 2 cheater accounts included into the final board. He’s stealing 10k$ from the community. See more here (5 & 6): https://github.com/kvaintr/lw-villains
I was referring to adding Aave to Kava. But thanks for the heads up.
But that was a chance for me to repeat my request :)
You did this analysis? Holy ..... 😳
I'ts a shame such cheaters should run away with loot 😡
Yes, and it was fully ignored
So now we have the ocular proofs. It's unacceptable turn a blind eye on it. That would be a profound wound to the community.
I requested all the validators and users to vote against. I strongly encourage the community to request their delegators to vote against
Il write to my validator
Is unfortunate but I believe if the proposal is delayed it will give the team more work load to make and prepare another looking at the road map and activities on their hand. I want to believe the team have a reason to leave those cheaters which would be better in the interest of the community if the team can explain why the cheaters are left on the leaderboard.
All I want is that cheater excluded. I don’t care about auctions or multiaccounts. But that was a direct cheat, hidden transfer of capital
Yes I agree with you and I'm also looking at the other proposals the team plan on put on vote once this two proposals are done plus a loaded road map ahead
Yes all that we want is transparency on decisions which involve the community. Denis has shown the smoking gun of the cheating, they must give us their reasons. Otherwise we are in front of arbitrary and whimsical behaviour.
We are all saying the same thing but then again I'm looking at the interest of the road map and the team behind it. They most have a lot of work at hand. So I believe a statement should be put to the community to address this issue as soon as possible.
Of course roadmap is important. But browsing the report and comparing the data is a couple of hours. If they do not have time they can spend this money on somebody verifying the data instead of giving 10k to the cheater
And they took a whole month to review and couldn’t find the cheats!
I believe not a single day was spent.
Very impressed by Denis' detailed analysis and examples. Whether the two alleged cheating accounts are removed or not doesn't affect me, but I do think the team should provide a response to the wider TG community in the spirit of open communication. @cryptoswithcam
Thank you for your ranking data, let me avoid many detours
My personal opinion regarding multiaccounts: the top account should claim the reward while secondary accounts should be disqualified. Regarding the current leaderboard: I don’t care regrading multiaccounts this time. At least they fought for the prizes fairly and didn’t have any advantage. What I care about is the cheater who got a lot of funds unfairly and steals from the guys who did their best
Respect Denis, I remember in one competition in the past I tell about several same accounts winning twice the same competition, Idk if they did it because of me but they did another proposal, but again with another accounts winning twice again. 🤷♂
Обсуждают сегодня