210 похожих чатов

Hi, just to make sure i get it right, regarding

how the network is secured and would prevent a 51% attack (67% in casper's case afaik), could an admin confirm the following :
- If i needed to "hack" the consensus protocol, i'd have to own at least 67 nodes in the current configuration, that would all need to win their bids at each era, and therefore stake enough coins to achieve this;
- This would require to buy at least 67% of all the staked supply, which is more than the circulating supply.. so trying to buy that amount would lead to a massive increase in value, which make it worthless to try to hack
- The protocol, by adapting the APR, always makes sure there is enough staked value to make it worthless trying to hack
- And finally if someone is wealthy and crazy enough to do it, once hacked all the value used for hacking is lost, as a hard fork would allow to quickly restart in the state before the attack ?

6 ответов

21 просмотр

Not an admin, but... The scenario you have explained seems correct. Though, the concept of 51% attack doesn't make much sense for Casper network. The attack makes sense for the PoW networks where you "hack" the network with computing power. Here, computing power doesn't mean anything. And if you buy 67% of the tokens on the network, then you literally own it. There is no hacking. :)

I'll get back to you on this, Bleezar.

Yes, to "hack" the network, you'll need to secure atleast 67% of the stake cspr to achieve that. By incentivising Validators and delegators, the protocol makes sure that there is large enough stake to make it prohibitively expensive to carry such attack. If someone is wealthy and crazy enough to do it like you said all value would be lost and honest validators would fork the network from the last known honest block height.

Hi there - You are close! For a safety fault, the attacker needs to get 67% of stake in the network (by acquiring CSPR). You are also correct, that circulating supply is less than 67% (because the holders have never moved the CSPR out of genesis wallets). No need to get control of 67% of nodes for a safety attack. The attacker would need to spin up a validator node and stake it. The attack would be visible to the community in the validator ranking.

It is possible for the community to rally and execute a hard fork to restore the system if this very unlikely attack happens

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта