Rafael missed to address and it gave me allot of pause and I wonder what you think about it.
The claim is - "The moment something better comes along, you will switch."
This gave me pause for a few hours. But for me, the answer is simply like with other open source software. If some app fucks up and needs to be forked, or something dramatically better comes along... I think we have to not shy away to embrace the answer that yes, switching is not herecy. But I feel in that talk it would look weird to admit or defend it. But after thinking for a bit, that can be the only right answer. Blockchains are just code, there can never be just one true chain, as there will never be just one true linux or anything forkable. And thats probably the point.
Your thoughts?
After the food franchise and crypto wars there will only be taco bell and pirate in the end. And toilet paper replaced with three sea shells.
Обсуждают сегодня