repeating "we can fade out", just talk about the purpose to do that.
My motivation is to discuss all angels to the situation. I have over 80% of my invest in Nsbt. I bought it to because of the passive income. To get that income the system needs to get used. But sometimes I think if new users can't take part in the government and have the option to participate in the fees because there is no room left than Thay will just use other chains.
there is always room to enter every NSBT holder may consider selling when the price is right. doors are not closed at all the price is simply way to low and artificially kept low to incurr selling undervalued NSBTs. Your passive income may be cut by 25% or by 50% after we finish this transition and in the name of what? allowing people to buy cheaply what should be expensive now?
There is always lack of marketing, we all know that
My question was which is the motivation to do such a change. And diluting value of assets is never a good motivation. Your argument is nonsense. You can't make people pay for the benefit of others. I am not a whale. And each time I got more nsbt, I do it with effort, so don't tell me that people can't buy NSBT. That is bullshit. We don't need lot of people without compromise acquiring cheap governance.
Reduce the unstaking fees. Problem solved^^
Which problem is fixed with that? The only problem I am stating is the proposal of cheap governance.
we can also allow voting and revenue distribution wothout staking any tokens. allowing all NSBTs in circulation to participate is still way better solution tha swaping NSBT to recaps
All we can do at the moment is speculating. Ther could be really good mechanics behind the new token. Maybe good enough to convince us to move over. When a roadmap is puplished we will have our vote.
We are not discussing whether there can be or not good mechanic in the new token. We are saying that any mechanic that implies removal of NSBT is bad. There are lots of arguments against that idea. And not a single one in favor.
That still will not be good for governance. Good governance implies long term compromise. And that implies locking.
It's true, I agree
Actually people cant unlock because they lose 99% of nsbt. Therefore nobody does is. If people unlock the Fee in nsbt goes back to neutrino SC and others people can mint it. Therefore it helps to recapitalize and to add new nsbt on marcet without diluting gov
They can, provided they wait enough. 99% of fee is when you deposit. This fee decays with time.
Well but even in 1 year the Fee is 25% for me... Actually it is 97% and i locked directly.
I staked indirectly. I asked my mom to stake my NSBTs for me, for I was too scared to lock it for few years. The beginning was encouraging though. Now I am thinking Kung Fu might be right, too long time…. Hmm, what can go wrong?
Обсуждают сегодня