No
How sure are you?
The proposal does not result in any burning.
please please say clearly to us....this site that started this voting is a fake site or not??????????????????
It is not a fake site, but it is not the type of proposal that would result in any burning. People are misunderstanding
What's the end result then?
Of the proposal? Nothing.
They are repeating like bots everyday the same text
It's the truth.
Admin, what you saying ? .you mean people voted for fun, we are not kids
so why they started this voting?????????? for nothing???????????????😐😐😐😐😐 another bad act from team? or they started it to just collect 51 luna from each person?????????😐😐😐😐😐😐😐
I mean what I said. It is not a proposal that results in any burning. Can't be much clearer.
So we are in the middle of no where? Right? Or can u just elaborate simply that what are the future plans of Luna and LUNC
There will be a roadmap released for Luna at some point. Don't know about lunc
What do you mean? Why can not burning if it's passed? What's wrong with it? Its going to burn our money?
It's a text proposal. Text proposals do not result in any changes being implemented.
Kinda fud mate.. It can be true, that's not the question.. But I think you are not related to the team in any case... Only a mod here I think, cause you don't give any other information
Now, which type will result to burning ot coins , do we have too types of proposer ?
You have to code the burn.
Admin please don't stress your self writing this again, you have really tried today. You have been explaining to them but they're not listening, rather they want to continue living in dreams. Let them to keep dreaming.
You patch the code and propose to upgrade the chain.
You're probably right. I'm not going to tell anyone to buy or not to buy, but I would prefer they did so with correct information. Futile as it might be 🤷♂️
This is not true imo, you mean only developers can make proposal ? If this happen, it means the system is bad
Did you think the burn will be added magically by some spirits?
Yes bro. You have tried very much. Let who wants to continue living in dream to be, atleast know one will hold anyone responsible if there dream is shattered into pieces. You have done enough bro by giving them correct information. Thanks
Do kwon is not listening to the community, the same community he panicked to lose and rapidly launched luna2. How stupid van you be. He will regret it Thats all I got to say
The same community who want him to go to jail and to let Terra Classic be community owned? lol.
Proposal for coding will come
Yeah, waiting on it. Eagerly awaiting to see project coming to a blockchain with no insensitive and high taxes.
Where can I reach real people for my airdrop? There is a lot of scammers writing and calling me…
I also dont know. I will wait some more days and than try to get my luna 2.0 airdrop. No idea how to do it now
You tell us that a coding proposal will follow
where is the account twitter dev?
There is no reason it could not follow. All we've been saying is this proposal is not it.
I received from after attack in another wallet a few of new luna automatically, but old lunc where i had real money…. Nothing
Means if dokwon puts a proposal, it would by applied... As luna is decentralised and community based platform, If community puts a proposal and desperately want lunc burn...then this is not a proposal.. It means Dokwon made it centralized instead of decentralized and will do anything he likes
This is nonsense
What about ustc? Any News?
If "the community" made the necessary preparations and the right kind of proposal it might stand a chance of passing and resulting in changes. So far neither of these conditions have been fulfilled. That is all there is to it. Trying to make the issue into something else is both disingenuous and unhelpful.
U have just said what u know. Can u pls still what what is the right kind of proposal? Or did u just type this out of here say?
Parameter change proposal
Why not have some balls and post this on twitter. I mean its pushing up the price and its trending. Dont you have a responsibilty if what you are saying is correct
I have spent literally hours saying the same thing here in order to prevent people spending their money for the wrong reasons. Kind of wondering why at this stage.
Idk which kind of proposal would be right then? Community and validators are in favour....but dokwon and some few admins dont want it.... IDK why you guys doing such and deteriorating people's condition
I have told you what the right kind of proposal is but you aren't listening.
Will Chen earlier on replied to Vegas that text proposal is the best. Besides, there are some proposals that were executed which were text proposal. It musnt be parameter change proposal
Well then educate as a admin, what would be a right proposal and what is wrong with the current one. You can scream someone is wrong this won’t make the conversation go away. if you want to make a difference educate
The accompanying code is still needed, and while there have undoubtedly been high quality text proposals, the one we're discussing isn't one. It's basically a comment someone decided to submit.
Twitter is where its happening. I have not seen 1 post whatsoever all day about what you are saying is true and trust me. I am active. There are articles, interviews ALL confirming it has gone through. How??? I dont get it. I am definitely taking it into account but it blows my mind.. Truly
Terra 2.0 was a text proposal and that was implemented. Stop spreading fud man
Okay got it... There are already highly text proposals, so whats the right time when you guys will accept such proposal?
Whatever it is, it is a step ahead to achieve our goal. All u need to do as an admin of this great community is to direct the community with encouraging words and not letting us think that all of our efforts were in vain. I think we all should be reasonable and considerate. It is not easy to bring out one's time and energy to write a proposal and see that it passes. It worths commendation and I think that is what u should focus on while u suggest a better way to handle the issue if actually u want us to get through this
I'm not aware of any obstacles to submitting such a proposal at any moment. It would then have to be voted on of course
hi sir when will we be able to withdraw lunc from osmos chain ?
I have limited means to have an effect on things and at this time I am trying to prevent people from FOMOing into a pumping token because they think burn is happening when it isn't. If they want to buy it for other reasons that's fine by me. Clearly many here see no value whatsoever in what I'm doing, but it's what I feel is the right thing to do.
No, its just a text proposal and some dev needs to implement it. If could someone make paramschange proposal(not text one) and program it right, it could be started once voting pass. Text proposal is just a..well its just TEXT proposal ;)
Then why is there a proposal that has over 120m votes for yes on the burn tax and everyone is saying it is passing?
Hmm. U seem to know better than those validators that voted yes and those that approved the proposal. I am beginning to suspect u. I doubt if u have any good intentions for this project but mind u, we will Excell at all cost whether u believe it or not
Because most never read the proposal and most who didn't only read the headline and not the part where it says "text proposal"
Voting on a proposal that has no effect costs nothing. Thank you for your vote of no confidence.
If you're so concerned with doing things right, you should have done them right in the first place. creating a fork is not the way, a lot of people lost a lot of money And how if this were not enough, the misinformation what is in this project is enormous
I never created any forks
You have any plan? Or you just talk like dk
Обсуждают сегодня