Wow ... just wow .. you people seriously think lunc

... will ever compete with Luna??

I am not here to be your teacher. You can pick up some knowledge from me for free, but if you want me to teach you, it will cost you a lot.

All that support and cant even hit $3. Your wasting your time with a forked coin.. lunc has triple the market cap of 2.0 and 4 times the volume on our bad days lol that alone proves our point. Nobody wants to trust do kwon and his forked coin.

You're entitled to your opinion, but to me it's a bit weird to say the real one is the one without the original creator, community, dapps and with massively different tokenomics & the mechanism that made it unique missing

NO HISTORY/NO FUTURE, that's what you are, at least you're honest lol.

Nice pivot from my points to my person. Do you intend to continue being a dick?

It's not just about Luna ..you only see 1 coin ... there's 90 odd projects hitting Terra.. what's lunc got again ? Not even staking ...which is 20% on luna

And it still has 3 times less market cap as lunc. That proves my point all those “projects” dont matter

Another distraction attempt ..you moon boys never answer questions ..you think you lead ... you don't. ..

Swappings back, staking is coming back on the 26th and the burn mid sept

You're a fricking moonboy, a LUNA 2.0 moonboys, clear our channel please.

The real one was abandoned by the guy who created a new one thus the 2.0

So? That's to be expected after $40 billion turned into 1 ...and Luna will struggle for a while till the vesting is done ... again .. there's more on the Terra chain than just 1 coin ... geeshh

All the projects dont matter then lol your just making excuses, “the reason luna 2.0 is doing bad is because lunc is doing better” thats how you sound

“Fud…only Lunc ….Lunc is all we need…don’t even need burn and Lunc will be $1 soon. Whales incoming…trust me” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Right. Both were created by the same person but only one of his creations is good now that the mechanism it was built on has failed?

Did you invest in Luna before the crash and did you invest with UST in any other the projects on the chain ... just yes or no .. please

Yea I invested in both did you?

Right .. did you farm with any pairs on the Terra chain ? Or just buy and hold them ? Please

Shib didn’t crash from 120 to less than .01…shib didn’t lose credibility and utility resulting from the crash either…but saying Lunc is a shitcoin is unintelligent? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

If its a shitcoin why are you here 🤣

I’m not sure if this was an insult or not…I don’t speak gibberish 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Doing my part to make sure any newbies that come here understand all the facts around Lunc…not just moonboy predictions and heavy doses of hopium

They need to make a new thing instead of mod and call it fud and make you the admin 🤣

Do you actually believe anything said here will move either token's price, at all? It won't.

Exactly

He's not wrong about some of the people who've recently showed up trying to convince others to buy in by repeating things that are unverified at best and made up at worst. It's dishonest and pretty annoying tbh. The kind of thing that goes on in glorified pump & dump groups.

See…that’s the only answer you moonboys have to anything said here that is not rainbows and unicorns…fud…brainless idiots😂😂😂😂

Nobody got people in a headlock forcing them to buy anything. If you choose to buy without dyor thats on you, but to say that were “moonboys” is ignorant. I could say the damr thing about people saying luna 2.0 will hit $100

You literally said you stay in this chat to tell people not to have hope in lunc a coin your not even invested in. That’s miserable. Focus on creating a luna 2.0 group and getting people to join.

I'd argue there's a difference between, say, pointing out projects building on LUNA vs. pretending CZ is sitting on a personal stash of trillions which simply isn't true. But I do agree with you in principle

Binance transactions aren't on-chain and no tax authority is going to accept using your company's accounts as personal piggy banks. Even in tax havens. That being said as we won't ever have any insight into Binance's internals the simpler explanation is that they aren't his because we have no reason to think they are. They are where customers' tokens are and as such they are almost certainly customers' tokens.

No…this is what I literally said: Doing my part to make sure any newbies that come here understand all the facts around Lunc…not just moonboy predictions and heavy doses of hopium…. You see that part: “all the facts” If you’re gonna come at me, better get your shit straight homie…or is this fud too?😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

You dont have no part to do anything thats the point. Nobody hired you or put you in the position to tell people anything. Instead of wasting your time “destroying hopium” 🤣 focus on 2.0

You do know thats it impossible to move users coins during a chain halt right? That alone is enough proof to state that those 1 trillion lunc moved during that time are Binances personal lunc

So are you implying that you’ve been hired to tell people to buy then? 🤔

Why is it possible to move their own tokens but not their customers'?

I haven’t told anybody to buy anything

Because it goes against their religious belief that CZ is going to burn all those coins

But have you been hired to shill Lunc here? Simple yes or no

I love “tuna”…especially on wheat toast with a splash of vinegar…😂😂😂😂😂😂

Because exchanges buy stock of crypto to sell to the users on the exchange. That’s how they make commission. Users weren’t able move their luna during the upgrade when the chain halted, but binance moved 1 trillion lunc. This in simple Terms was the stock of their own lunc.

I don't understand. Everyone knows Binance deposits are made into one wallet with MEMO acting as a reference number. If they move that around internally it doesn't in any way prove it's their own funds. Internal transactions in an exchange are not on-chain transactions and don't care about chain halts. It's more or less a glorified Excel sheet.

I understand but you cant just move users lunc without their permission. Especially during a chain halt. If that was the case they would’ve moved the entire supply but they didnt.

Of course you can. Users don't know or care which specific tokens they receive, only that they can withdraw the amount they think they should when withdrawals are enabled. And as a customer you won't know or care which Binance wallet the tokens come from. As an example Binance will play around with customers' funds that are in locked staking all the time

Im not disagreeing with tou but your missing the main point staking wasn’t enabled at the time and the upgrade caused a chain halt. Binance wasnt able to just take users coins and move them. Therefore the only coins they moved had to be their own

If I were Binance and you deposited your tokens into wallet A. I then moved them to wallet B and made the withdraw button give you tokens out of wallet B you'd never know. Or even didn't move them, just gave you some from wallet D instead

The chain halt meant no new blocks were being generated on the blockchain network and holders specifically couldn’t move their Terra assets until the blockchain was unfrozen. Doesnt matter if it’s Binance moving them or them themselves. The only coin binance could’ve possibly been able to move is that stock I was talking about. And tbh there was no reason for them even if possible case scenario to move 1/3 of the users coins to a another wallet just to move them back

Certainly it matters whether the transaction is on chain or off chain. If tokens are held in Binance they can move them around internally as they please, regardless of who owns them. For all we know they could be lending out and speculating with your coins while they have custody of them, like Celsius did. They might even have to buy them off the market when you decide to withdraw because they might not have as much available as users wish to withdraw. It's certainly not unheard of for Binance withdrawal freezes to last longer than chain halts. They occasionally freeze withdrawals even if said chain is not halted. Dodgier small time exchanges do it even more. Point being these transactions do not in any way indicate whether they were Binance's tokens or their customers. Seeing their business is to facilitate buying and selling it is a lot more likely they are customers'.

You make some good points but i dont think cz is that risky. Imo I believe Binance is going for a beneficiary and that if they did decide to burn those 1 trillion coins it wouldn’t necessarily be for the benefit of the community but for the benefit of themselves and they would play it off like it was for the community. In reality if they did burn it would help the community though price wise. I know cz lost alot of money during the crash so I believe personally that somebody on their team figured out by doing the math that if they burn x amount of their supply then the x amount they’re left with is worth more than what they had before plus another 1000x more.

I've heard it's standard practice for exchanges to move coins around internally to make their trading volume etc look better, my suspicion is CZ wanted on chain, as the other way could have perhaps exposed some of the inner workings of the CEX's

bugok!!