hear Casper is no hype project, which is kind of weird to set equal: marketing = hype. On the other side it seems CL is way more active (approaching enterprises, tech development of the chain, presence at events) then CA.
Is marketing a thing in the future for public chain adoption next to corporate adoption (= active markteting from CasperLabs)? What are the plans to drive public chain adoption? And looking at competition with huge marketing budgets and ecosystem funds, what will make Casper stand out and what can it offer to bring not only users but devs to the chain? Why should devs choose Casper over other layer ones with huge user bases, massive budgets for ecosystem developmemt and already thriving ecosystems? Where do you see the public chain in say 2 years (talking 3rd parties, a huge variety of dapps, not from huge enterprises)?
I can address this in more detail on the AMA, but importantly you are making a fundamental assumption that real businesses choose infrastructure mostly based on being paid by projects to do so. I don't think this is true
Not all of them, but it can be attractive to smaller projects enriching the variety of dapps on a chain.
Обсуждают сегодня