210 похожих чатов

If it is possible to be open minded about this

question: Do you feel like potentially there is a "paralysis by analysis" happening? Not paralysis as in there is no work being done, but I am sure these other networks with exploits and down times and such also went through rigorous testing before launching. And even those had the issues that you were mentioning. It seems like there will be issues no matter what on any chain.
So, with the possibility of issues still existing after launch and after this preparation: Do you feel trying to get it perfect before launch is something that will mean continued development for longer than is actually necessary? (This question is formed after being roughly 6 months out from the initial launch date, and the LGCY Dev team having an additional 6 months to build and harden. )

1 ответов

13 просмотров

There’s needs to be a balance for sure. There are also no repeats. People invest their hard earned money with LGCY and we need to ensure that we both produce but also prevent catastrophic scenarios from happening.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта