and it has the budget to make it happen without impacting its bottom line. We see the constant handwaiving that it is a "separate entity," yet it raised funds, gives grants, has employees in both orgs, farmed from the onset, sold rewards, and it pushed through a vote to reenable rewards after the DAO vote to stop them. This paper argument of being separate is not based in reality as they comingle when convenient and feign separation when support is needed. Why wont the team push the Foundation to fund the gap following some snapshot of x time of deficit, commit to a plan of funding (direct reimbursement, buyback, loan, etc.), then pause the protocol after making everyone whole and work on a sustainable solution? Dragging LPs along with no timelines, and minimal info on plans when the risk of increased IL is on the horizon is reckless and negligent. Please give a serious response to this.
Tbh, this is pretty inappropriate to joke like this when they lost $32M dollars
Comedy has no limits ser I appreciated his joke
Обсуждают сегодня