and Nate participated during V2.1?
Bancor is a fully on chain system. Anyone who uses that system assumes the risk, seeing as the code is fully open source and visible to all users. This fact is disclosed in the terms of service in the UI. You can cherry-pick whatever claims you think were misleading. Mark and Nate were independent contractors paid by the foundation to explain and simplify these concepts. If you took that as “promises” or “guarantees” that is your problem. The only guarantees are in the code - which unlike centralized, closed source systems - is fully available for everyone to see and analyze. Numerous third-party auditors reviewers the code. ILP was live for 2+ years. To say something was hidden is simply untrue.
Did you actually reada the current terms of service? I did just yesterday
And I didn't say the remarks made in chats are the sole reason to believe they promised 100% ILP. It was in their bio, it's in many of their docs etc
So you are now blaming the protocol for designing itself towards retail? For trying to create a safer and simpler user experience? The risks were disclosed from the beginning. The risks in DeFi should be clear when you’re using it.
I don't remember any risk being disclosed to me before I deposited
I'm not sure on this, I would love to see the disclaimer shown when depositing but I'm unable to find it now that deposits are closed
Обсуждают сегодня