of why the Foundation simply didn't take no action as opposed to voting in "Abstain," which contributes to quorum?
Ok I think it's very obvious here that the Foundation did know that their "Abstain" vote was necessary for quorum to be met, and for that reason they took that action versus no action at all. No one is answering my question, but it's not necessary because it's obvious on its face.
Обсуждают сегодня