My motivation for 400% is to ensure gCOTI is affordable in exchanges for everyone to buy.
Then, another vote will then represent more of the community and set the gCOTI APY “permanently”.
Much fairer for all, no? 🙏
So youre basically saying the people who didn't commit to the project longterm or take advantage of the campaigns (native or erc20) or spend hours on the community campaigns should take a hit on their APY whilst everyone else who now finally realises Gcoti IS an asset worth having plays catch up with acquiring Gcoti?
I’m saying let’s not mischaracterize it. A common complaint is under-representation and unfair distribution. Those are valid concerns. Especially for (example) Americans who are holding a sht ton of COTI with no representation.
Americans who can't participate in the Treasury therefore the Gcoti governance token of the treasury is kind of irrelevant for them as of now?
Обсуждают сегодня