is very positive. I look forward to its implementation.
However, I do think it would take an incredibly long time to expand distribution. I am in favor of anyone being able to buy on exchanges at the lowest price possible.
That is my motivation for campaigning for the 400% option. After there is significantly more gCOTI in the hands of significantly more people, I would likely then support a new vote to increase gCOTI APY.
As my bags continue to be a focal point of fascination or admiration (?) for being x8 120 with liquidation threshold comfortably below the year’s low, I will address those comments about it.
If 1600% prevails, I will convert the earmarked extra COTI to gCOTI. I will be 1:1, regardless of the price of either.
If 400% prevails, I will delay converting the earmarked extra COTI to gCOTI until it makes sense to do so.
According to what others have published here, the difference to me would be ~2%.
Those familiar with my TA acumen should know I could blindfold trade (something else) and make far more than that in a day. Fact.
So, the attacks on my bags or motivation regarding profiting from my support for 400% is silly, from my perspective. Those who push that narrative are foolish, naive, or simply haven’t been paying attention in the trading channel.
🎤 drop. ✌️
So just for clarification YOU want the 400% so YOU can accumulate Gcoti at a lower price all whilst earning a higher APY on YOUR x8 deposit.Then once you've got enough you're happy for a re vote to adjust the APYs but sure you're definitely looking out for thr "little guys"
You are not comprehending correctly. Re-read the part about the price of either does not matter. Then, confirm your comprehension.
"Those familiar with my TA acumen should know I could blindfold trade (something else) and make far more than that in a day. Fact." - Now that's some entertainment I would watch! 😂
It's his modesty . That's the reason we all love his posts.
Обсуждают сегодня