I agree there was a lot of caution. The reason

Question

I agree there was a lot of caution. The reason

being that the last thing they want is to get in trouble with regulators. I can’t imagine the cost and stress that would cause. So if you’re Ecomi and you’re saying as they have done, that Omi is a utility token, and it was meant to have utility but then there was the whole issue with the omi burn mechanism being very similar to share buybacks so they had to pivot. Now they have a new solution which is the omi gem pool and bronze tickets, but currently that hasn’t been activated. So there is still technically no utility. If you then go listing on a load of exchanges with no utility, imagine If you got pulled up on it by regulators. What are u going to say in your defence? We are a utility token but we have no utility but we thought we’d list anyway? Would you want to argue that corner? I think they know this but they can’t talk about it. So they are going to get utility. Then exchanges will come.

#cryptocurrency #ecomi #english

0

11.11.2023

1 ответов

56 просмотров

Frank · Accepted Answer

Frank

I’m not worried about listings. I would just like to hear a solid plan for utility. This is what we are currently working on and what we plan to focus on next, Omi will continue to be an important part of the company …I understand the radio silence on when, that makes sense given the history but a commitment to the current plan. Of course I understand we are owed nothing in terms of communication

0

11.11.2023

209 похожих чатов

I agree there was a lot of caution. The reason

1 ответов

Похожие вопросы