210 похожих чатов

1) Building is great. I like what the are doing.

Can't pretend we're here just for the tech. I also assume all the moderators have some sort of CSPR incentives. Do you own all those CSPR to just to pay for your own computation or as an investment vehicle? Food for thought.

2) I don't think paying exchanges CSPR token to list will cause any law violations. I don't see how that's a no-no for Casper but not for top 200 tokens that already have done that and are listed in American exchanges? More tx volume is great. Increase in CSPR/USD valuation mean CL/CA can sell less qty (same with dev grants). It's just beneficial.

3) Generating more Cointelegraph/CoinDesk articles and sponsoring top YouTube influencers with 100k+ followers is a great idea to get the selling point out there and can be paid in CSPR. CA could come out and be more accountable and give timelines to when you can see certain marketing and give a bi-weekly notifications maybe. They have a marketing director for B2B for Labs. I don't think they have one for B2C, which I guess kinda explains what's going on. Writing articles and posting that on Casper websites won't do much good. Has to be ads/videos where 100k+ who don't know much about Casper.

Constructive comments here. Maybe it's just "acknowledged" and tossed away. Idk. Maybe not.

3 ответов

24 просмотра

Point 2 is very interesting - AFAIK that was a big issue for the DEVxDAO as well (which was stopped months ago) since the applicants asked for USD but most of the time got the equivalent in CSPR.

Good points. I haven't seen an article about Casper in a long time.

I agree. 3 will follow for free after solving 1 and 2.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта