I'M stoked about the tokenomics and I'm curious where skate

Question

I'M stoked about the tokenomics and I'm curious where skate

fits in with the Trilema...yes its the fastest and most efficient but is it truly decentralized and secure as well? I'm actually gonna invest no matter the answer it would just the cool to see if it solves the trilema as well.

#cryptocurrency #english #skale

0

01.01.2024

4 ответов

21 просмотр

Mark | I do not PM first

Hi Titan, The Blockchain Trilemma does not apply to SKALE in the same way it does for other networks. The trade-offs don't align in the same way. For example, an increase in the number of SKALE nodes (which increases decentralization) also increases both security and network capacity/performance (scalability). That would not do the latter in traditional blockchains (in fact, that would have the opposite effect, which makes for a key pillar in and major reason for the trilemma. This does not apply for SKALE). There is also no max cap to the number of possible SKALE nodes, which means scalability is also not capped, all without security getting sacrificed (in fact, security is even improved with more nodes, as randomization makes collusion less likely the more nodes there are). So on SKALE, there can be any number of nodes supporting and securing any number of blockchains. There are no trade-off relationships between the 3 parts that are associated with the trilemma (scalability, security, and decentralization).

0

11 месяцев назад

Mark | I do not PM first

Hi Titan, The Blockchain Trilemma does not apply to SKALE in the same way it does for other networks. The trade-offs don't align in the same way. For example, an increase in the number of SKALE nodes (which increases decentralization) also increases both security and network capacity/performance (scalability). That would not do the latter in traditional blockchains (in fact, that would have the opposite effect, which makes for a key pillar in and major reason for the trilemma. This does not apply to SKALE). There is also no max cap to the number of possible SKALE nodes, which means scalability is also not capped, all without security getting sacrificed (in fact, security is even improved with more nodes, as randomization makes collusion less likely the more nodes there are). So on SKALE, there can be any number of nodes supporting and securing any number of blockchains. There are no trade-off relationships between the 3 parts that are associated with the trilemma (scalability, security, and decentralization).

0

11 месяцев назад

Gez190

Mark | I do not PM first
Hi Titan, The Blockchain Trilemma does not apply t...

🎁

0

11 месяцев назад

Mark | I do not PM first · Accepted Answer

Hi Titan, The Blockchain Trilemma does not apply to SKALE in the same way it does for other networks. The trade-offs don't align in the same way. For example, an increase in the number of SKALE nodes (which increases decentralization) also increases both security and network capacity/performance (scalability). That would not do the latter in traditional blockchains (in fact, that would have the opposite effect, and is thus a major reason for the trilemma. This does not apply for SKALE). There is also no max cap to the number of possible SKALE nodes, which means scalability is also not capped, all without security getting sacrificed (in fact, security is even improved with more nodes, as randomization makes collusion less likely the more nodes there are). So on SKALE, there can be any number of nodes supporting and securing any number of blockchains. There are no trade-off relationships between the 3 parts that are associated with the trilemma (scalability, security, and decentralization).

209 похожих чатов

I'M stoked about the tokenomics and I'm curious where skate

4 ответов

Похожие вопросы