tokens. At any point, if someone has access, they can dump the supply.
As that’s never been clarified, there needs to be trust that when it was setup, that either no one has access to those addresses, or, RH has access and will not sell.
How is that not obvious?
RH talks about how OA is only there to secure the chain. If he has access then he can always burn some too if he wanted. But never been touched and highly likely it will stay that way.
That supply is not locked.
What’s the most common thing you hear on any site, “past performance in no indicator of future potential”. It’s no different to this, and, that’s what the “fraud investigators” pointed out (I don’t know if that’s the appropriate term). The man in the fraud duo Eveb goes as far as to state “RH has been a benevolent king/cult leader. That doesn’t mean he will be forever” paraphrasing here slightly. Which then, in then, makes the system reliant on RH (or the mystery person) who has access to all the OA supply, someone that people need to have trust in. And, as @Nenad rightly corrected my misspeaking, the tokens are not locked up. So they can be liquidated. At any point. So, again, I revert to my original question, does anyone know what the purpose behind the documentary was/is? It says it was produced by Rackham Rischel (going to mess that spelling up). Has he said what his intention was for the doco anywhere?
The documentary is produced by a 3rd party and has nothing to do with Hex or it's founder except RH and some community members being featured in it
Обсуждают сегодня