i can
1) deploy jobs/workers myself/natively on azure vs
2) going through iexec to access workers/hardware on azure also
why i would i choose 2 vs 1 ?
As an investor i think i need to understand that to understand if the recent announce from Gilles is truly accrual for RLC
https://x.com/gilfedak/status/1733175408382595443?s=46&t=N6AD4EXywD1jULGSDGPiJA
Currently iExec is making research on NVIDIA confidential GPUs . In the source code iExec has the capability of deploying GPU pool and participated in NVIDIA inception program . But its not announced or planned for such integration .
Ok perhaps i should not have mentionned GPU. Let’s stick to CPU. May i reformulate my Q with CPU What is the benefit of running workers on cloud cpu via iexec rather than deploying directly on azure ?
Simply in my understanding decentralization of HPC is the main point and giving users opportunity to keep their personal data private and interact only with ethereum address . I will send you the link in a sec
Ok so you say: if for my own reasons i wish not to be a customer of azure but happy to run my jobs on azure i could be willing to pay some RLC to do that. Is that a reasonable reformulation of what you say ?
This kind a question should be answer by a team member because it is the goto question for newcomer who try to understand the project
Обсуждают сегодня