of GPU compute only going to be specific confidentially enabled GPUs? IMO that could possibly be a mistake because almost no consumer owns them. Unless you could choose to have either.
Ya my understanding was it's confidential only, it would be great to get clarification. It we had a public GPU pool with a normal gaming GPU and actually had models being trained (even as a demo subsidized through iExec or not), it would be amazing. I feel like if you compare the main pages of iExec vs other projects their sales pitch is a lot better, and is more focused directly on either AI or distributed computing. On the iExec page its really in your face nearly as much. It would also help if the market place wasn't 99% python hello world and TEST DO NOT USE lmao. I wonder why there are so many of those hello world apps running endlessly. Render has done amazing in comparison, really blew up before all the hype now
iExec talked about their vision for AI last year. https://medium.com/iex-ec/how-is-iexec-empowering-ai-3a4ae648574f I wouldn't expect much beyond "iExec enables Owners of valuable AI assets to be able to monetize them, while maintaining ownership and preserving the confidentiality of these assets". I see it as another if we build it they will come situation similar to their past products. iExec doesn't plan to do actual AI computing. Building a decentralised GPU platform with public worker pools similar to render would take a lot of money, talent, and coding hours.
Do you know that it is difficult to have GPU workers incorporated into the existing network to be a lot of work for a fact? They talked about the H100 GPU research so I'd imagine they are at least considering confidential GPU computing
Обсуждают сегодня