I suggested that if they were putting out the message that AMP would be the governance token, but at the same time were working on ANVL, then that was disingenuous.
I agree with this point. It's not an issue to disagree. But it is an issue to insist daily that it's a rug pull.
Also if they were not working on ANVL during the time that message was going out, then ANVL seems to have had a short development time...
Anvil is what we've known as Ampera Protocol. The name changed. They've been working on it for quite some time.
I have been respectful and done my best to make my arguments clear. It seems to me that any disagreement is considered "disrespectful".
Why, on day one, before one has realized, "you know what? this is Probably just a rebranded ampera," would one would allege the team can't be trusted....
If the ANVL token is the Ampera Protocol then why were we told that AMP would be the governance token?
For the second time, that's obviously changed.
I believe through test net they realized that AMP had too much friction to serve as both collateral and governance
Maybe this is the third time for me, but again, why put out the message that AMP is the token when they already know it is a new token?
They could've just given us LOCs to use to vote in governance lol
At the time, it was accurate. But in the time since they've determined a change was needed. "We are eager to announce significant milestones at the Ampera Foundation (AF), marking a year of exciting progress. The journey has been transformative, with pragmatic shifts that lay the groundwork for our future. In an effort to adapt and respond to the evolving crypto landscape, today we are introducing two distinct projects: Ampera and Anvil. This strategic decision stems directly from listening to community feedback, and our long-term commitment to best support the crypto ecosystem."
Think you will find since the beginning of modern time companies working on projects discover something revolutionary and work on that at the same time but you won't find the posting it on the front page of the TIMES until it ready to go .think about what your saying .discovery is the way of modern man
Yea well maybe don’t dip into TG chat and tell investors wagmi
OK guys Wagmi and by the way we have be working on something super secret HERES THE DETAILS GO TELL EVERYONE LOL 😆
Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. My second issue is with the messaging about this change. Does this decision to create two distinct projects (Ampera & Anvil) really come directly from the community? That is why I asked anyone to chime in if they were involved with giving this feedback. "This strategic decision stems directly from listening to community feedback, and our long-term commitment to best support the crypto ecosystem."
Yes .. I would like to commend the community folks who gave this feedback. who are you? please raise your right hand !
Provide proof of your feedback. verbal feedback is hearsay . !
You've got to forgive @DrunkenBarbie she get off her nut on voddie and forgets sometimes 😆 😆 😆
Обсуждают сегодня