something wrong.
One should not let a person who is famous for his experience and business acumen become a kind of 'sponsor' of the project. Should one person be disruptive and shine a light on the community?
Fxs is undoubtedly underestimated. We identify 4/5 people suitable for our community marketing 'launch' needs. We offer him I don't know 5% that is in the hands of the treasury. In the end it is a bargain for him but it could also be a bargain for us. A way to restart the blocked marketing engine.
Or, fraxtal and Fxs will grow organically with the help of the existing community. I choose what is behind door #2.
To give an impossible example. Enter Musk and 2 days we are at 100B..
I have no idea which people can make market dreams fly...
It is the standard chicken and egg dilemma. We need more liquidity, but, there needs to be apps for that liquidity to value fraxtal. Fraxtal could front load points and say, bring over your liquidity without many apps and we will just front load flox incentives for your liquidity and then, when apps come, hopefully that liquidity stays - this is risky, but, doable. Option 2: provide an algorithmic mechanism (flox) that will incentivize liquidity and dapps alike ongoing based on value to the ecosystem and is sustainable. Option 2 is a slower grind, but very valuable.
Обсуждают сегодня