to implement consistently. This is how I understand you:
1.) Focus on a smaller number of chains rather than issuing on more chains
2.) On those chains focus on one, usually the winner/dominant, liquidity venue.
Do I understand you correctly?
Exactly, thanks for being civil and taking my point even though it was presented… rudely
It's a reasonable suggestion and we'll take it to heart. It's hard to know ahead of time where the winners land but once it's more obvious, I agree with you.
Обсуждают сегодня