right? So no one had to trust another human, you just trust the code. That was my interpretation of the BItty white paper.
So I’ve been wrapping my head around how HEX is a trustless system when one person has access over 80% of the supply, and, as far as has ever been stated publicly, no one knows who that one person is.
To me, the system works, it’s proven, and yet, every HEX holder has to trust in that address with over 80% of the supply not to ever sell.
Am I missing something, because to me, that’s not a trustless system.
https://imgur.com/a/I361fM3 PLS is the native coin of the Pulsechain Network and therefor doesn't have a contract address (same as ETH doesn't have one). DEX Website https://app.pulsex.com The PLSX contract. Decimal: 18 0x95b303987a60c71504d99aa1b13b4da07b0790ab The INC contract. Decimal: 18 0x2fa878Ab3F87CC1C9737Fc071108F904c0B0C95d The HEX contract. Decimal: 8 0x2b591e99afE9f32eAA6214f7B7629768c40Eeb39 Alternatively click the "Fox" icon On PulseX next to a token to add it to metamask automatically.
Then neither is any other crypto. One or few entities own the vast majority of every single crypto. The difference is most of them dump on your head. The OA has never sold and is benevolent at least has been till now
That’s my point exactly, appreciated mate. Even when people claim things to be a trust-less system they aren’t, because whenever something has centralized ownership, purely through share percentage, the trust I Has to be that the majority owner has the needs of everyone else in mind. The second they don’t, the trust-less system no longer works.
Trustless in computer sciences refers to execution of code.
Even on the outer planets 🪐 controlled by the hutt’s
Обсуждают сегодня