current investors if we keep merging? The supply just keeps increasing but the price does not move. It just makes it harder for the investors to generate any profit? Why cant supply stay the same or burn supply to allow merge to happen? This way everyone wins?
The token merge has not been created for a profit It allows three projects to operate under a single token, enhancing their interconnectedness. Being part of the Alliance means that the builders will have access to more tools and services across the platform as the teams integrate over time.
But it dilutes our tokens and is basically inflation? If we keep merging our tokens stay the same price (say $1.4) but the marketcap keeps increasing? What happens when the marketcap reaches 100b through merges and price is still 1.4? No one here wants that. To put simply we are all here to make money and the more our tokens get diluted, the more we get pissed
ok, let's clarify some things about inflation. For example, if you hold Ocean tokens, they contribute about 23% to the total supply of ASI. At first glance, it might seem that the token is diluted because it transitions from one token to three. Let's continue. We need to understand the concepts of market cap and FDV: - Market Cap = price of the token * circulating supply - FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) = price of the token * total supply This means that when the market cap increases, it does so along with the token price and FDV. Remember, the total supply is fixed. You might ask, with the integration of CUDOS, whether the ASI token's total supply increases by 88,946,755.672 FET. While there is an augmentation of total supply, FDV will increase as new tokens are vested over 3 months, and the treasury over 10 months, following the token merge. Regarding the price, the value of your initial investment won't be diluted because the total supply remains fixed.
Обсуждают сегодня