me make it resistant to the $5 wrench attack?
Attacker has to find my derivation paths. I sometimes forget where my derivation paths are at rn. It is a lot harder than it looks. $5 wrench attack on Bitcoin.com wallet. And it might be missing addresses from my EC wallet. If I am getting beat with the wrench, I am not going to be in a problem solving state to find my BCH for the attacker. The $5 wrench attacker will have to know about "scanning the gap" too. Is it account 141? Or 283? With my BCH Or 12?
what do you have in mind? slip39 is interesting
The issues you have with that wallet are automated and fixed in other wallets like for instance Flowee Pay
Decentralize signing to you and four other people. In a special 2 of 4 multisig (and multiparty) where your signature is required plus another. No wallet currently does this. People leave their cash money in banks for a reason. The same reason is why people would want this kind of a system. It will be different in that none of the signing parties and not even a conspiracy could confiscate funds.
EC already does multisig. SLIP39 would be more advanced style of multisig
If you have a 1of2 or then the other signer can freeze your funds. If you have a 2 of three with two signers, the others can conspire to steal your coins. If you want to allow any of four cosigners to give you a protection of another signing four separate parties without the ability to conspire to take your coins, you need a 5 of 9 and the real owner keeps 4 key pairs and four for each of the cosigners. I am just wondering how hard it would be to get someone to do the cosigning in such an arrangement and how does the signature get into the final transaction and can we get EC to keep four of the key pairs.
i dont really get what youre asking. play around with creating multisigs on EC if you dont get how the UX works
Обсуждают сегодня