Wallet instead of Metamask?
(I managed to get a much better gas fee converting my Eth to Hex on Atomic Wallet so I went with that instead of Metamask)
Or is there any particular reason I should want my Hex in Metamask specifically over Atomic Wallet? And would the benefit (if any) be worth the gas fee moving it over?
Is there any added benefit from having Hex staked prior to launch? I mean aside from the obvious fact that the point of Hex is long term staking, but do you get anything else on Pulsechain if your Hex was staked vs liquid?
it doesnt matter which wallet its on as they all follow the bip-39 protocol and can be restored on any other wallet. you want to use MM though because on MM you can change the rpc settings to point it to other networks like pulse. i dont think atomic gives you the option to point to other networks/configure rpc's
well, i have hooked up the rsp settings for the pc testnet.... but do i need to shift my atomic wallet hex to the meta mask or can they just stay in atomic
1. You might want to consider getting a hardware wallet instead of either Atomic or Metamask. It'd be more secure. 2. If you do decide to just use Metamask instead, you could just import the seed from your Atomic to the new Metamask, and then just use that (and delete the Atomic). There'd be no need to do a 'send' an incur GAS fees.
Обсуждают сегодня