maybe some issuer fees?
That's one of the revenue options for RSV. There will be an interest for the collateral issuers to share their revenue with RTokens that use them as collateral, because the bigger their circulating the more money they make with their deposits in traditional banks and money markets. But this is only once RSV has a dominant circulating in the industry, as long as it remains small that's unlikely to happen.
So, RSV = no revenue. And centralized (no censorship resistance) am I correct?
Can you elaborate on it? I don't quite understand what you mean?
RSV won’t be insured, so no rsr staking so no revenue. Revenues will come from rsv2 the yield bearing stable if it’s used. Or other rtokens. In this revamp rsv is centralized (controlled by reserve). That’s another shift
Обсуждают сегодня