209 похожих чатов

Hi guys, would like to ask two technical questions: 1. Isn‘t

there any other solution to launch canonical without band? What about LINK (biggest oracle provider?!) and other solutions?
2. BCIP-5 includes IBC, but band oracles are already „working“. Why do you not want to integrate band oracles without IBC functionality?
Thank you in advance fam/team

6 ответов

8 просмотров

please refer to this gov forum post https://gov.injective.network/proposal/discussion/2392-band-integration-delay-opportunity-to-still-launch-on-time/

Test- Автор вопроса

So there is a final „decision“ that canonical will be launched without band ibc integration? Would be nice if that is true 🤝

Test
So there is a final „decision“ that canonical will...

The community is voting on this at the moment by sharing opinions in the gov site post and in the groups. For now the majority decides to go forward with Coinbase oracle as a temporary solution until band is ready

Test- Автор вопроса
Seranium🥷🧬
The community is voting on this at the moment by s...

that would be great 😍 Injective has a great future and shouldn‘t become dependent from other projects 👍🏽

We are working on LINK integration but its not ready yet. Band oracles are ready, thats true, but the best way to integrate it with the Injective Chain is through IBC. IBC is the proper way of sharing data between chains built on the cosmos-sdk because its cheap, really fast, efficient and reliable.

Test- Автор вопроса
Bojan Angjelkoski
We are working on LINK integration but its not rea...

thanks, i understand now. one more question: LINK is oracle market leader and every defi project has integrate Link, so sounds for me that it “must be easy” to integrate. What makes it actually difficult?

Похожие вопросы

Карта сайта