don't they say anything?
You have to give them a chance to make excuses. Pushing them like this doesn't seem like a normal process.
This case is the first judgment by a decentralized authority. It is not a decision made by a judge in the institutional jurisdiction.
But the process seems to be lacking.
give them the right to object
Exchange bps compete with b1. Having the right to vote can be a problem. And the fact that they did not provide an opportunity to plead is also a problem.
I see this case as the first decentralized trial
What is happening now is being done by decentralized institutions. Even if the probability is low, if there are victims, they cannot get help from the system. should be treated very carefully
This is also related to the trust of the entire blockchain.
The vesting case is also a problem. Exchange bps are in competition with b1 so their voting rights must be void
Name 1 top level developer in B1 chain team.
The details of why they quit are not known from the community. The important thing is that the process of asking b1 whether to give up eosio was omitted.
We'll have to wait and see if it's cool or if it's an ico with just a name change
Are you Brendan?
It would be cool if that were the case
Обсуждают сегодня