Since the client reveal depends on the other party, and

always has, why was it promised, or hinted at, however you want to put it, by Dom? What changed? Could we get some clarity on that? Now it seems that client reveal might never come, why were you so confident about it in the first place?

Dom never promised to reveal client names. He said we would onboard enterprises and we have. Client reveals will come when the client is comfortable.

And nowhere in the last 6 months anyone though of maybe correcting the community on this false assumption?

Makes sense. Would look better coming from the client.

There was hope that enterprises would reveal themselves.

"Client reveals. Large Enterprise customers in the blockchain space are still a rare thing. I could name only a few projects out of the whole space with massive announcements with Enterprises. It is because getting Enterprise to adopt these novel technologies is the hardest and, at the same time, the most powerful and rewarding real-world adoption validation. We are confident that Syntropy is very well established to make Enterprises publicly acknowledge the importance of our technology by joining this new network. Our team made tremendous work laying the foundation to ensure we achieve real-world validation on a large scale, having continued and accelerating enterprise adoption as a model for Syntropy growth. The results of our work are already proven, so we're super excited about what's coming later this year." If that's not promising then I don't know what is. ( or hinting at, at the very least. )

You guys have revolutionary technology, why are you guys even impressed by these f500's. If they dont wanna help, they can use the old internet forever. And lose their competitive advantage. Its that simple haha

Alright. They decided not to at some point in the past 2 weeks or so. And now we're dealing with the blowback of allowing this hype to grow over the past few months. You do see the issue there right?

No doubt we could have communicated better.

Also - the header clearly stated 'Client Reveal' - that's even less ambiguous then 'staking begins' smh.

Our communication strategy for the past years was not perfect, and we are well aware of how to improve it. Even if we feel very confident and excited about some events happening in the future, we will remain silent before the fact actually happens. This approach will help us control the expectations, so similar situations don't happen in the future. We will let our technology, sales, and business development achievements talk for themselves, and we are sure that most of you will appreciate this change of communication strategy

Good idea 😅.

💯

You guys said that after 60 days of growth mess, clearly it hasn’t changed

But it will do now.

Great first step! You can still elaborate on the grand vision without concrete commitment so don’t stay silent in total. Now only need to wrap past things up nicely about expectations and we are good to go!

This doesn't help atm though. The fact that you yourself stated that the investor reveal would certainly happen by eoy when I asked about it months ago. And then Kevin just now stating Dom never said there would be a client reveal - even though the header under which he talked about eoy client onboarding was 'client reveal' is just .. kinda lost for words here.

Yea you’re here to provide clear communication, I’m well aware about you guys not making our bags happy.

We're on the same page 🙏

The communication guidelines are obviously set by the c-level

Let’s use the Dom’s letter and this whole situation as a comms reset and move on forward with a new mentality. That’s my personal Christmas wish. Because trust me, it’s super hard being on our side too. We are all humans

Yep all we can do is look forward

This is a step towards more traditional way of communicating things. I just hope a lot of people will not start to ask wen news now 😅 The coming developments themselves should make anyone happy.

Yeah, we learned the hard way, news should be an annual event here lol

Haha not asking 'wen' questions? Is that even possible? 😂

Maybe I can suggest that the clarity that is sought after is handled with some bullets on those old wounds like t1, revenue, roadmap etc . This was really a good first step but I cannot hide the bad taste in my mouth of not having the revenue question answered and feels deliberately avoided. I don’t envy you CM guys at all and want to stay positive but that was a real avoidance by c level

Listen, nothing is personal from my end. I do my best to stay civil in my criticism and positive when I see an opportunity to support. But I've made large financial decisions based on statement made and interactions here. I trusted what was said over the past 6 months and feel like a sucker for it now.

Totally understand your position

Regarding the question whether enterprises are using $NOIA: It took years for us to go through PoC > Pilot > Customer stages. The most important thing at the moment is that Syntropy technology is actually being used by enterprises & we have a growing sales development team to keep bringing more of them constantly. Now we signed them after successful pilots, we are ‘warming’ them up to the crypto world. You have to understand that we are talking about enterprises, not some fruit stands, so there’s still “education” on the crypto side of things to be done and I know that Jeff is very pro-active about it. As Dom mentioned earlier, we're gonna have to go through certain stages before we can make the token experience as smooth as possible, but the vision is very clear and solid. The customers won’t even have to deal with the token side - we will do it for them. This whole tokenomics-side part is now in a testing phase, so honestly - don’t expect for the first customer revenues to represent in the market. However, you can be sure that enabling token side of things with the enterprise clients is certainly our top goal. To bring it into the perspective, I imagine the whole flow as follows: PoC > Pilot > Customer > Going Public > Starting to use token solution. I think the hardest part is over.

Thank you for 90 percent answering (not mean to be cynic I am genuinely surprised). Remaining question is that if dollar revenue is given (logical that they want to stay stay from crypto stuff still) how is that handled behind the scenes . Why is that not being transferred by yourselves ? This in the end is also token value without enterprises having to deal with it. If that part is answers a lot of us will be happy

Unfortunately I cannot anwer the rest of it at the moment, but I’ve already shared that question with Dom and he’ll come back later to bring more clarity on it. Ant perhaps will answer the rest 10% of it.

Not fruit stands? What happened to watermelons!? The greatest deception

⬆️

Watermelons are still in our heart ❤️

Thank you again and hope that will solve a lot of issues with the community. Even more if the answer is that transparent in a good way that it will be bought on the market (and not OTC) in retrospect 😇 ok enough with short term sights and happy holdingdays eh I mean holidays

Will we get to hear about their anonymous feedback?

You will hear about their feedback. We are really keen to reveal the first customer success case study, but not going to happen before publicity

This 👌

🙏🏻

Company needs to scale hush lol

That's why Jonas was so happy haha