we have an AMA that is not a puff-piece interview, but a proper AMA, with provision for hard questions?
3. What will team do about getting liquidity into the project? As promised.
4. What about publicity? As promised.
4a relocate at least an office or indeed the project if SEC is an issue
4b clarify in such a way that community understands that it has to do the heavy lifting re the promised aggressive marketing.
To repeat, "the tech" is now irrelevant.
I echo the same view and have been doing since last few months.. People don't take it as constructive criticism, but nothing positive. If they ask these 4 points to be put in Governance for vote, then it's a sad state for how the project is being dealt with!
Are you agreeing with me? If so, much appreciated!
Community members run governance telegram, not the team, to be fair.
japp totally agreeing. we now need next steps / clarifications / explanations...
I get that. But can't governance put more pressure on team than me pissing into the wind?
Обсуждают сегодня