? Dont understand that part
Up to you. Staking is a single asset operation, but for LP you need to have MIR + an asset (e.g. ust). In LP you are exposed to impermanent loss but in staking you wont; if you think that the MIR price will increase heavily, it is better to stake it, but if you find it stable or with low divergence (I mean the ratio between the two assets you LPed), it would be better to do LP.
It's very general opinion. you may google for more detail.
I believe he is referring to the MIR single asset farm
Do you know maybe what is APY for staking, cannot find it on page
They have removed it from the platform because they say it is necessary to be decentralised! You should check it at discord channel. I will check it for you right now and will let you know.
codeNoodle — Yesterday at 10:08 AM Calculated 7-day MIR governance APR (12/18-12/25): Excluding votes: 12.40% Including votes: 45.89% this week and next week: had a baby, data was slightly delayed, but has been estimated/accounted for within ~2% error of reported percentages
I didn't find the updated one, but it should be around these values: APR Excluding votes: 12.40% Including votes: 45.89%
Thanks! What does the excluding votes/including votes mean?
If you vote in the governance tab of mirror protocol (i.e. https://mirrorprotocol.app/#/gov), you will be rewarded with some MIR token. So, the "including votes", takes into account those rewarded tokens.
Обсуждают сегодня