what about the stable coin and saving product communicated by cosmos team? wasn't it discussed with injective before publishing those informations?
You can learn more about our road ahead here: https://blog.injectiveprotocol.com/injective-2021-review-and-the-road-ahead/
Why not giving ETA for next bridges? Or giving sequential order for bridges at least (ex: binance, Avalanche,...)
If we gave ETA we will create expectations for something to happen at a certain date. And if that thing doesn't happen exactly on that date the community tends to overreact by a big margin. This way we are not creating expectations which in return gives flexibility and less pressure on the community.
Because some things are not relying on our work only. An example is Chainlink integration, our end is finished, we are waiting for them and ETA can’t be provided. Things that we will focus on are explained in the article.
On the topic of others needing to do their bit, is there any update from Trezor? I have both Ledger and Trezor, so am sorted, but it would be nice to widen things
Bojan sorry that I have to say that, but this statement has come up too often in the last few months "not relying on our work". It sound like INJ is simply unimportant for other market participants (link etc.).
These things take time, software development is not magically done overnight. For big projects its extra work because they have to allocate resources, form a dev team, project manager, do security audits, etc.
Exactly ser, I'm a Dev as well at the company I work for some ppl don't believe I work on a development system which excist for more then 30 years and still been developed as if on today 👌
Обсуждают сегодня