understand dapps are on there (over 100?), but is it fair to say the network growth has not been spectacular and why there was effort into evm and higher hopes there? Is it the portability of the evm (ease) which hopes are rest upon for quicker network growth? If so, what does that mean for native if after 3 years network usage is still low? Is the idea to get more adoption on evm and hope adoption there means more use of native? Or should I not been separating the two and see it as one piece of the same puzzle. I guess where my main question is, can telos evm stagnate for 3 years like mainet has? What lessons have been taken away? More marketing is the theme I'm hearing to get more builders with the associated tools/infrastructure to help them?
Some dapps will take advantage of both sides, for example areaX is deploying on evm as well
Обсуждают сегодня