Any killer dapp coming after this?
One problem I see with these proposals is that they attempt to generate revenue from the network of participants BEFORE that network is sufficiently consolidated. As of this point, EOS ecosystem is far from a consolidated network. It hasn't achieved a state of stable growth in any criteria that I can imagine, neither in number of developers, nor number of dapps, nor growth of individual existing dapps, nor volume of real transactions, etc. On the contrary, EOS is facing fierce competition for scarce resources, such as talented developers, from other L1 platforms such as Algorand, BSC, Avalanche, cosmos, polkadot and many others. Any argument against those platforms' models may or not be valid. But the fact is that they are competitors and the market so far has decided in their favor. So, before focusing on monetizing from our challenged platform. What is needed is a bold strategy on making the network grow and actually achieve network effects and profit from Metcalfe's law. Now, because the symbol allocation issue is real, I propose the following protocol which improves from Dan's ideas: https://hive.blog/eos/@aguerrido/regarding-symbol-allocation-on-eos
It’s not about attempting to generate revenue. It’s about letting the market allocate scarce resources as effectively as possible. Eden and other governance process can allocate the capital to attract devs. Setting a price of zero only attracts squatters and devs are still left out.
Could the market and a "reserve" system co-exist as @Chibchombia's post suggests?
Show me a single project that would bother going through these hoops instead of just deploying a token contract.
one way that will happen is if wallets refuse to list alternative dexes from those token contracts
Why? The business activity is close to zero. Why would wallets refuse something?
oh they often do; because they are afraid you might be scamming the users
Ahhh, I just read this. https://medium.com/edenoneos/how-to-prevent-name-squatting-d35796cded35
@bytemaster7 👆here's a simple and elegant solution to the auction deal. I would add that reservations could be made only once by staking EOS, but Amount Staked = Period of Time (ex. 100EOS = 1 WEEK, 1000EOS = 3 MONTHS)
Devil is in the details
According to my proposal the price will be zero for everyone except squatters, which would lose their locked EOS.
Dan, there are some amazing opportunities and possibilities of token and NFTs that we still have yet to discover. Let's not close the door on these ideas thru financial disincentives. How about this idea of tokens and NFT collections as one latest example? https://twitter.com/truerinfo/status/1480301375053393920?t=dMP1TpNBh0sw2mE_onQUhQ&s=19
Обсуждают сегодня