with Dan's new proposal Dapp developers are not able to change token supply or inflation? the new token contract will be controlled by the bps?
so the current system the dapp developer has control of the token contract vs with the new proposal the bps will control it?
No, it's just about premium names. I'm struggling to imagine who would need that. We have a much more real problem, like investors turning away the next moment they hear EOS
could we have both systems running at the same time?
Nobody is cancelling the old system. Why would they
so why not try this new system that Dan is proposing for devs that wanna use it?
It's not solving any of existing problems, so why bother
seems like there is a lot of benefits like it inherits all the eos governance powers, dapp tokens will be compatible with all other tokens, it will upgrade with new features as the network add new features, it will allow bitcoin style transactions, it will allow to do contract pays, it will allow to transfer tokens without paying ram, ect...looks like there are many benefits with Dan's proposal
What is anything in your list so specific to the system token contract? It's just a token contract, nothing special
it seems like it offers better security as well where dapp developers are not commingling with the code 😜
Can adjust it down, not up.
if they can't adjust it up then that means they can't print more tokens and take some profits 🤑😜
They can lower but not raise
A central token contract like this does solve problems.
Would an algo stable like UST be impossible to recreate using the new system then? UST gets burned to create LUNA
No. Such a token would set the limits to infinity
Would be great to give developers the 2 options, one centralized option and other more decentralized option...users will decide which system to trust 😁
Обсуждают сегодня