bch, and answers them, could also double as a kind of feedback to the community - I feel like bchers should be armed with a lot more information than just saying its accepted in st kitts, or bch devs are awesome
like bch is it a store of value? and take a hard look at the price and tokenomics of bch, I feel we don't have honest enough answers in bch
I mean it can be refreshing, instead of doing a interview with a dev and just hyping up everything like its roses, actually address some of the questions detractors will say about bch, like whats the reality of sbch, what's the potential, what are its hiccups.
I feel like people aren't stupid, and when we do stuff that papers over it like we are getting massively adopted, they get turned off and think its scammy.
This is very much in sync with what I have been thinking the community needs. And also more accurate information about competing coins. When I judge altcoins based on the info I get in r / BTC I often get it wrong and that isn't good for my ability to argue in favour of BCH persuasively. If I did the videos I would really want to compare and contrast coins on the nitty gritty facts and details, but I have been worried that this will cause me to keep getting labelled as "the enemy" which I have had way too much of from the BCH mods on r / btc.
well if bch mods ban you for questioning things, then it isn't a bch worth staying in because it means something deeper is broken
They never banned me but they made extremely clear that they really, really wanted to.
Обсуждают сегодня