Everyone talks about giving $4B to B1 as if it came from them. How much did you put into the original token sale and do you still hold it?
🔗 Context 🔗
Someone explain to Brock what a DAC is, I don't think he understands the definition of community. WE gave Block.One 4B$, no one is saying they specifically gave 4B$. He thinks this is a legitimate argument to separate and pick us apart, more divisiveness. How about this, Block.One owes the same tokens that were used to purchase EOSIO from them, 1B$, since he doesn't recognize people as entities. If not, how about he owes those who still hold the tokens 1B$. They made the promise of investment, I don't understand what kind of bullshit argument this is. How about this, because of B1's negligence many who bought from the original token sale ended up selling what B1 turned into a bad investment, and therefore no longer hold any, why would they? B1 didn't invest into the community, why would they expect anyone else to? I swear, Brendan, Brock, and Dan seriously tweet things as if they aren't standing in front of people saying these things to their faces. No one who has to deal with others in person talks like this.
That comment makes nonsense. Reality is different. You just make many assumptions on your mind.
Brock had part in the ICO
Please explain what doesn't make sense, or where I make assumptions.
Yes he did, which is more reason for him to understand what he's saying.
Обсуждают сегодня