fair to do the vote like that?
I saw you making fun of me on that vote with your touchy way about that 5/6% more, even if it is completely normal given how you formulated the question,( Unfair Animal) in the chat where you should have more fans.
I would have expected a plebiscitary result from it in that contest.
I'll do not ask for a vote on the chain because probably ill make happy only someone in HK.
127 vs 160 is not a great result. probably I'm not that wrong like in the last 3 years I was not wrong on:
-bp mafia
- the wallet was/is impossible to use
-b1
-rex
-defi
so many words and proclaim few facts ( June is coming)
-voice
-bullshit
And probably is the time to explain to "your" community all the shit behind you and B1, I still can believe you created a centralized company after speaking for years about decentralization, with your biz partner, and instead of protecting us from inside you left and give all power and resources in the hands of that guy who broke all promises.
Why don't you give us some explanations about it?
I'm glad you made me notorious.
if it wasn't for Dan the eosio software wouldn't exist...EOS, WAX, TELOS, and all eosio eco system wouldn't be here without Dans contribution...basically your pointing out negative side of the project and avoid mentioning the positive side of things...this is an unfair assumption from your point of view
Without Dan there would be no EOS blockchain and no Mandel do you get it ? Dan is the brain behind EOSIO. However I agree with you that B1 are scammers but Dan didn't have any power in B1 because he didn't have 51% of the shares that is all. The guys who have the power at B1 are the ones who have more than 50% of the shares.
Обсуждают сегодня