to be active in eden or fractally dao. The token holder still wants to be in an investor position.
This is like instructing investors to go out on the field and work to increase the value of their tokens.
Would you treat such a person as just a speculator?
They dont have to. But if they want to they can, thats important
Yes, we can choose whether participate in the fractally dao or not. Token holders who do not want to participate fractally will continue to say that fractally is not a priority for the eos mainnet.
Since the beginning tokenholders were not satisfied with the governance. Eos cartell is a famous fud in crypto
I am also very dissatisfied with the EOS BP cartel. But I don't understand the point you were trying to make.
Fractally improves governance
I understand what you were talking about. I don't have the ability to evaluate which governance is better, fractally dao or ENF. However, I believe that the interests between ENF and token holders are aligned. That's why I support ENF, and I'm against the immediate adoption of fractally.
ENF is not governance
Okay. The first two paragraphs may be inaccurate in the explanation. But the key to what I want to say is the last two paragraphs.
Fractally shouldn't be used till its has proven itself but I support on building the software ASAP so adjustments can be made to perfect or improved the system...it's better to have a product vs no product where it can be tweaked around
Обсуждают сегодня