I'm using Dan's own words from his book
Yes, I've seen this...
Then you should know about "political chess"
I do...I still don't understand what you're getting at
How do you know you're selecting the best leader vs selecting the best speaker?
Wisdom of the crowd reaching consensus. And doing this repeatedly. Then you have to evaluate the person selected going forwards based on their actions.
🤷♂
This doesn't reduce the chances of some crafty 2face SOB from swindling the crowd
So what is your preferred form of governance?
fractally handles this better.
Could you please explain how?
Code is law sucks for governance.
But that's not what we're talking here
This can only take you so far, then it always breaks down to intent
Intent can be gamed
Must rank high enough in weekly meetings to be on the council. Only those who repeatedly bring value to the community get to lead.
When is the council decided? Averaging X amount of weekly meeting scores?
Yep. Council decided a few weeks in I believe.
All kinds of people in Eden argue with me but don't know what "political chess" is nor have read/comprehend Dan's book
Then why are you talking about political chess...
Without Eden the concepts of fractally wouldn't exist
Political Chess (timestamped) https://youtu.be/g1hPRWioFY4?t=1820
Обсуждают сегодня