your ideology huh? Sucks it doesn’t work like that.
Yeah and that’s not an argument.
Hia Marc, u do great work. Hope you got good advice from some of the pepls here how best to invest some of the FlipStarter BCH so that you extend your finances amap. 👌🏻
No… the claim is people are been forced … my claim is they are not… therefore the claim that people are been forced is a lie.
> claim is people have been forced what's the article 7 for then, showing off?
Those who, by evident and notorious fact, DO have access to the technologies that allow them to carry out transactions in bitcoin are NOT excluded from the obligation. That isn’t “no one”.
That’s what I said. Lets test your logic here. If someone points an unloaded gun at you, but you don’t know it’s unloaded, is your life being threatened? Seems your answer should be no here, and ifit’s not, you need to try figure out why an unloaded gun is different than an unloaded law. OTOH, even if your answer is no, I suspect that wouldn’t fly in a court of law.
if that was true, then I'm pretty sure the LN users that went to check on El Salvador should've gotten their BTC-LN used when they asked, because some of them were rejected because Chivo wasn't LN
Where does it say that ? You are inserting words that are not present!
Its forced. Sorry that the truth doesn’t fit your ideology.
Chivo is lightning I used it yesterday
Show me someone been forced
Article 7.
And?
Not forced
Forced.
That is how law works, it applies to everyone who isn’t excluded.
Обсуждают сегодня