a very prideful and stubborn bunch. I think that framing it as parallel blockchains within the avalanche ecosystem or something of the sort instead of as subnets would help with adoption.
Having ava in it still implies that it is lower than avalanche in the scale. I don’t think I would chose that.
Imagine you are in the place of a blockchain founder. How do you let them save face so that both parties can collaborate and work together?
Yeah I mean if someone makes a technical decision on where to launch based on the fact that he doesn’t like the prefix “sub” I’m just gonna say ngmi. It’s just a technical term used in IT
Обсуждают сегодня