them and as per what u said this will remain the same, so where's the need for a committee ?
Yeap. The committee would be able to review whether the confidential clauses are in line with BitDAO's interests, if the other clauses are under compliance and laws. Eventually this information would become public after a period of time. In my opinion we need a committee if we want to receive these special proposals and deals, next time will an informal committee evaluate other proposals again?
And who runs this committee?
My suggestion was 5 people, 3 representatives of the biggest contributors (Windranger, Mirana and Alameda) and 2 members with no professional connections with them. But this is customizable.
But doesn’t this make it kinda like parliament?
Обсуждают сегодня