they accommodate those who have their assets locked in staking/unstaking or have moved onto exchange?
Would they do a retroactive timestamp before the chaos? And where would value even come from?
Why do we say that when there's nothing suggesting that would happen except one proposal posted by a fake account that isn't even up to a vote?
Hard to imagine a way to save Terra, its developers, its ecosystem, without re-rolling the chain, considering that trillions of LUNA were minted in a few days. Were not for this thriving ecosystem, it would be difficult to imagine why external money would be injected into the chain after such a fiasco. If you think differently, I would like to hear your opinions. Respectfully, preferably
I agree with you in principle - however all the talk about a new chain that goes on here is -at this time- entirely made up.
They will collaterize de UST, if you want to take a loan you have to leave an asset. I guess luna could be use for staking and also as colateral . Governance maybe or fees. APY maybe will fall and be variable acording to loans in orden to make it more sustainable.
Ust is widespread token. I think it s still interested to investors who wish to print USD like tether. 11 bill circulation *0.09= 1 bill USD and you re lucky owner of usd printer. Only two factors are needed - negotiate price with Kwon and show 10 bill usd somewhere. Thats it. The rest are formals. Now these people dumping ust and filling bags, in the other case ust price was like luna
Обсуждают сегодня