off of researching the algorithms that other projects had success with”?
No. I believe it's fairly simple how it works. The complexity in my opinion is upon the community deciding later if the program is of benefit and what to do about it, so the paper spends considerable time in prefacing through discussion what the community should consider when evaluating the program for our network.
whats the proposed network for that evaluation?
It's all EOS as it's complimentary to the EVM, the recommendations and proposals are in the same fashion as previous blue papers where ENF asks for research, recommendations, and proposals on a specific topic and the authors provide that. After that, it's open to considrations. It would have to be live for a period to evaluate in my opinion.
It's all EOS as it's complimentary to the EVM. The recommendations and proposals are in the same fashion as previous blue papers where ENF asks for research, recommendations, and proposals on a specific topic and authors provide that. After completing the report, it's open for consideration. It would have to be live for a period to evaluate in my opinion.
sorry i meant more which projects gets additional yield, and which dont
It's all TVL-based reward, meet the TVL threshold for the tier, receive that tier's reward.
Обсуждают сегодня