security. I know Telos is ahead of this compared to other L1 but even Eth may be in trouble. What are you thoughts on this guys? @DAPPerD @foflexity
I shared my thoughts on it: https://twitter.com/Douglas_Horn/status/1533137529712496640?t=6BTW_AmElteSV4N250sz6w&s=19
If you look at the text here, you'll see that it seems to require some kind of investment contract to make the coin a security. That would be an ICO or similar. Telos never had one. Also, a security means that investors look to some other entity to build value in the investment. Who is an investor supposed to look to with Telos? GoodBlock? CalEOS? Kanda Weather? No one could successfully make such a case in my view because any single entity could walk away and Telos would continue to operate the same. https://twitter.com/SmallCapScience/status/1533108714017722369?t=d4XN1yHCipQ0O4kyFE4xig&s=19
It was drafted by a bunch of BTC maxis, which is part of the reason for the language
Indeed. But unless they specifically call out Bitcoin, which laws generally don't do, we're probably good. Laws describe what's okay based on traits not names and it will be hard to make bitcoin okay and not Telos by the same rules.
Thanks Douglas! Eventually people will realize how important this is and learn about TLOS
Isn‘t telos running on Etherum? So it will also go down? (I think that I‘m understanding something wrong) would appreciate an answer
We have a bridged version of the TLOS token on Ethereum for trading on Sushi/Uniswap
Telos is it's own L1 chain, though there are some bridged tokens on other chains to improve liquidity for holders.
Обсуждают сегодня