209 похожих чатов

Why put in rsr at risk. Why not simply liquidate

collateral. Or is the case of loss of stakd asset Ltd to time of volatility?

9 ответов

9 просмотров
Bigger- Автор вопроса

Can someone enlighten me please?

What do you mean exactly? In what scenario would the protocol liquidate collateral vs. deploying RSR (for insurance purposes)?

Bigger- Автор вопроса
Sinatra
What do you mean exactly? In what scenario would t...

Liquidation of Undercollaterised positions instead selling stakers assets to retrieve debt

Bigger
Liquidation of Undercollaterised positions instead...

So you propose automatically redeeming stablecoin users for less than $1 per RToken? Why would that be useful? Who would want to use a stablecoin that accepts de-pegs?

Bigger- Автор вопроса
Sinatra
So you propose automatically redeeming stablecoin ...

Do you you understand how maker or aave liquidation Works ?

Bigger
Do you you understand how maker or aave liquidatio...

I do. The difference with Maker is that DAI is overcollateralized. RSV (or any other RToken) is 100% collateralized.

Bigger- Автор вопроса
Sinatra
I do. The difference with Maker is that DAI is ove...

100 collaterised asset it's pegging to or different asset? What I mean is rsv is collateralised by another stable coin or by volatile asset

Bigger
100 collaterised asset it's pegging to or differen...

RSV is collateralized by 1/3rd USDC, 1/3rd USDP & 1/3rd TUSD. But that's really just a simple version if what RTokens can become in the future. Here's some useful links that you may find interesting: - How RSV works: https://reserve.org/protocol/how_rsv_works/#main-content - What are RTokens?: https://reserve.org/protocol/rtokens/#main-content

Bigger
100 collaterised asset it's pegging to or differen...

If you prefer video. https://youtu.be/9omWRDjQPlE

Похожие вопросы

Карта сайта