What about burning news? I'd passed please let me know

It has been explained 1000 times here that the proposal in question was not ever going to result in any burning because there was no technical implementation in it whatsoever

There’s no need for a technical implementation though, it’s a proposal showing that community supports an off chain tax that can support burning a bit like what Mexc are doing. With regards to on chain burns, proposal 4080 covers this. We need the official Twitter of either Terra or Terra Classic to tweet that proposal 3568 passed and the community supports OFF CHAIN tax. Kucoin are waiting for news from the official terra team.

Okay then. I'm sure burning is then taking place and no code changes are needed.

But this is not true. The group who made this proposal have a technical background and also a plan. If you have lost all the hope, why are you here? Genuine question, I am somehow worried that this will result into a major burn out for you. Trying to convince people with half truths.

Yeah...agree

Okay. Burning is then happening because someone wrote a some text and people voted on it. I thought software involves coding but obviously it's based on forum posts.

When ibc will open

Yes no code changes are needed if it’s off chain like on a Cex like Binance. The exchanges need to readjust their transaction fees for buys and sells to 1.2% just for LUNC trading and send to the burn wallet like what Mexc are doing.

Is the Terra forum the governance forum for Binance?

The guy who thought of this proposal and the implementation of it has a technical background, why don’t you want to understand this?

didnt seem that way looking at his first post in the github lol

when ibc will open?

don't know, there needs to be a co-ordinated LUNC chain halt by validators to upgrade the chain

Why don't you show me technical part of this proposal and how it's working right now? I don't know why you're pretending you don't understand what I'm saying. What I am saying: burning is possible What I am also saying: there are actual governance mechanisms on implementing changes and writing a random piece of text is not it Your "IT team" don't fix your network issues by sending you a message do they?

Please what is stopping the needed procedure to getting the proposal?

Because of luna 2.0

Assuming they actually have the code, nothing. A new proposal needs to be made and the vote will have to pass and if it's correctly implemented it will come into effect. Just it seems more popular to discuss why Do Kwon and Luna 2.0 are stopping all this and not the fact that there was no process to do any of this underway and people thought a piece of text will do something.

Could this be a mere politics to forestall the proposal as to give Luna 2.0 a kind of a leverage?

No, because nothing about the governance process has been changed. It is the same process to implement changes as it has been. All that is required is that it is done properly.

I asked again. What is stopping it from being done properly?

Because they don't want to invest funds and time in dust 😂😂 do you think Do Kwon is wasting time with a dead project?

Ok I think you opinion is clear. Thank you 🤣

And because Do Kwon is not interested in it, is that enough reason to stop the wish of the community? Is the governance supposed to be centralized or decentralised?

But that's not the first text proposal that was implemented. The proposal on luna2.0 was a text proposal also

That proposal had support from the devs before the vote even started

You are comparing the proposal presented by a company with leadership and dev team that validators have been working with for a long time to one that's presented by a random guy on the internet that doesn't have a dev team.

So why did this one pass?

Because there more yes votes than no votes.

I don't speak for Orion so I can't say

Sounds like democracy 🤣🤣🤣🤣

There was a poll on their telegram about it so they voted yes lol

Isnt that what governance is, the community wants for the community token, why dont ypu lot as admins cooperate together and get this implamented

They vote for this proposal that you say the proposal that wont make any actual changes, their voting power is 13.9% , why people like them bother to voting this proposal?

According to @rosanne_89 they had a poll about it.

I have 0 power to get something implemented whatsoever. I also think it's frankly quite embarrassing for the community to beg for TFL to do things they should be doing themselves

Why they must had a poll for proposal that you say wont make any actual changes?

Probably because people were pressuring them with threatening emails

They mustn't. They chose to. If I were them I also would have done the same thing because there's money to be made if people stake with them.

#m1h